<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: If LDL lipoproetin &quot;causes&quot; CAD, then WHY did the GISSI study find MAJOR CAD reductions with INCREASED LDL?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mybadcholesterol.com/ldl-levels/if-ldl-lipoproetin-causes-cad-then-why-did-the-gissi-study-find-major-cad-reductions-with-increased-ldl/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mybadcholesterol.com/ldl-levels/if-ldl-lipoproetin-causes-cad-then-why-did-the-gissi-study-find-major-cad-reductions-with-increased-ldl</link>
	<description>A Natural, Simple, Little Known Solution</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 00:44:59 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joe T</title>
		<link>http://www.mybadcholesterol.com/ldl-levels/if-ldl-lipoproetin-causes-cad-then-why-did-the-gissi-study-find-major-cad-reductions-with-increased-ldl/comment-page-1#comment-2347</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 11:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mybadcholesterol.com/ldl-levels/if-ldl-lipoproetin-causes-cad-then-why-did-the-gissi-study-find-major-cad-reductions-with-increased-ldl#comment-2347</guid>
		<description>There are no LDL studies in the GISSI study and they did not report finding major CAD reductions with increased LDL&#039;s.

You can check it out here: www.gissi.org

The Lyon Study information provided above is wrong for 2-reasons:
1. It specifically stated that the overall DIET were factors, not just cholesterol
2. &quot;The findings from this study imply risk factors beyond lipids and lipoproteins (cholesterol) that have been our primary focus in secondary prevention. The fact that omega-3 fatty acids exert cardioprotective effects in several ways suggests that they could have accounted for the results that were observed.&quot;, from  http://www.americanheart.org/presenter.jhtml?identifier=4655

What they DO say is that the DIET including OTHER FACTORS COULD HAVE accounted for cardioprotection.

Obviously, the comments above were not well researched.&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;References : &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;virologist</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are no LDL studies in the GISSI study and they did not report finding major CAD reductions with increased LDL&#8217;s.</p>
<p>You can check it out here: <a href="http://www.gissi.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.gissi.org</a></p>
<p>The Lyon Study information provided above is wrong for 2-reasons:<br />
1. It specifically stated that the overall DIET were factors, not just cholesterol<br />
2. &quot;The findings from this study imply risk factors beyond lipids and lipoproteins (cholesterol) that have been our primary focus in secondary prevention. The fact that omega-3 fatty acids exert cardioprotective effects in several ways suggests that they could have accounted for the results that were observed.&quot;, from  <a href="http://www.americanheart.org/presenter.jhtml?identifier=4655" rel="nofollow">http://www.americanheart.org/presenter.jhtml?identifier=4655</a></p>
<p>What they DO say is that the DIET including OTHER FACTORS COULD HAVE accounted for cardioprotection.</p>
<p>Obviously, the comments above were not well researched.<br /><b>References : </b><br />virologist</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
